Article Critique for Intellectual Research -myassignmenthelp.com

Questio: Discuss about theArticle Critique for Intellectual Disability Research. Answer: Sexual right is a privilege that every individual in the society needs to enjoy regardless of their state of body or mind. Jeffreys (2008) suggests that the society discriminates and denies priveledges to people who have some disability especially males. Further Abbott (2013), argues that this becomes worse if the individual has an intellectual disability. The inability to behave like the rest in the society makes others treat them as lesser beings who do not require equal rights like other people. For example, gay people with some form of disability suffer silently since the society denies them the opportunity to express their sexual desire like others do. This essay analyses the two articles on Abott (2013) and Jeffrey (2008) on disability and the male sex right. Aboot (2013) asks whether there is a human right to love and have a love life for people with disability. In most cases, gay people are denied certain rights or privileges since studies tend to focus more on HIV prevention and sexual abuse. The society presents barriers through the absence of parity that starts from childhood. They are denied sexual experiences like flirting, dating and sexual interaction that will define their sexual orientation. Further, Jeffrey (2008) adds that the society is developed on masculinity with men having the right to abuse and use the bodies ofwomenne for sexual desires. The law of the male sex right allows those who lack any form of disability to explore the world around them and achieve sexual desires. Since the society is designed tosegregate people with disabilityn through state sponsored programmes, male people with disability are denied an opportunity to have sex since their female counterparts can be forced to such desires by men. These men are denied their sexual rights through exclusion from the basic rights that other citizens enjoy. The society denies disabled men sexual Jeffery (2008) argues that the prostitution niche is designed to look like it serves the noble purpose. Therefore, people with disability are seen as less noble and may not qualify for such services even if they can afford. The issues are more worse if the disabled want to access same-sex privileges like the case of gay men. Even though some countries like Australia have made strides in achieving the rights of people with disability. Abbott (2013) states that the male syndrome threatens such rights making the society to ignore them. further, mobility issues may deny such men the rights since they may lack resources or the means to interact with other people in the society to achieve their sexual desires. Jeffreys (2008) a feminists scholars who fights for the rights of the people suggests that proper strategies can be put in place to achieve the rights of people with disability. This will include the an intellectuallydisabled and gay people with disability. The use of sex surrogates and facilitated sex customised brothels for disabled persons is a step in achieving sex rights for disabled people. Further Abbott (2013) who was once a socialists and now an anarchists adds that, the state can act as a choice architect through creating theenvironmentthat pushes the society to realise the rights of people with disability and allow them the right to enjoy other sexual privileges that are beyond sexual intercourse. The authors recognise the fact that the society is male dominated which leads to exploitation of people with disabilities. Indeed, all over the society, sex has been attributed as a male right wherewomenen may be exploited in one way or the other. However, male masculinity allows men to explore the world for their sexual desires thus leaving out people with disabilityies(Swango-Wilson, 2008). This even becomes worse for same-sex relationship people. However, they fail to recognise the lack of empirical data on how the rights of such people are violated. The two researchers gathered their data from a few sources which may only reflect one side of the situation. sexual health rests on the right to freely express desires. Therefore, the researchers did not exhaustively focus on the critical factors that need to be address to allow people with an intellectual disability and disabled gays to express their desireto people of the same-sex that they are interested with. The authors view sexuality as a central aspect of being human thus every individual needs to be giventhat right. However, only female disabled have been said to be exploited while their male counterparts have not been reported. Turner (2016) adds that the male syndrome forces men to die silently rather than report their sexual frustrations. Could it be that there are a lot of disabled men who are sexually exploited by their family members or in areas where they seek satisfaction. What role do surrogates play in sex therapy?. On the other hand, Fitzgerald Withers (2013) suggests that disabled people may fail to recognise what they exactly need. This may form the basis of discrimination and limited assistance since a right cannot come from ignorance. At the same time, although governments may putstrategies in place to improve the conditions of people. Sexual desires are catered for under expression and not directly provided by governments since sexual and reproductive needs are locate d in the individual. Does it mean that there is need for the government to revisit the rights provided to its citizens. The authors conclude that people with disability face disproportionate difficulty in sexual fulfilment despite possessing the same needs. The society fails to recognize the silence in the society where people fail to address sexual needs of disabled people (Aunos Feldman, 2002). From an anarchist perspective of Abbot, the rights of the disabled are violated while Jeffrey believes that the society needs to take responsibility and assist the disabled. For example, there are challenging issues like sexual assistance to disabled people which may be more demanding to the society especially for those who wish to engage in same-sex relationships. Alexander Gomez (2017) suggest that the society may recognize the rights of straight people but find it challenging to address the rights of this specific segment of the society since it may be difficult to understand them. Therefore, the society has to learn how to recognize and understand the needs of this special segment to address them. Assis ted sex for people with disabilities exists but in most cases, gay disabled peoples same-sex rights may go unnoticed since the society fails to notice them. References Abbott, D. (2013). Nudge, nudge, wink, wink: love, sex and gay men with intellectual disabilities a helping hand or a human right? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(11), 10791087. Alexander, N., Gomez, M. T. (2017). Pleasure, sex, prohibition, intellectual disability, and dangerous ideas. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(50), 114-120. Aunos, M., Feldman M.A. (2002). Attitudes towards sexuality, sterilization and parenting rights of persons with intellectual disabilities. Intellectual Disability, 15, 285296. Fitzgerald, C., Withers, P. (2013). I dont know what a proper woman means: what women with intellectual disabilities think about sex, sexuality and themselves. British Journal of Learning Disability, 41(1), 5-12. Jeffreys, S. (2008). Disability and the male sex right. Women's Studies International Forum, 31, 327335. Swango-Wilson, A. (2008). Caregiver perceptions and implications for sex education for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Sexual Disability, 26(2), 75-81. Turner, G. (2016). Pleasure is paramount: adults with intellectual disabilities discuss sensuality and intimacy. Sexualities, 19(5), 677-697.